Band 9 model answer
Across much of the developed world, fewer people are choosing to marry and an unprecedented number now live in single-person households. This shift stems from several interlocking causes, and while it is partly a matter of free choice, certain measures could nonetheless ease its more harmful side effects.
The reasons behind the trend are largely social and economic in nature. As women have gained financial independence, marriage is no longer a prerequisite for security, allowing individuals to prioritise education and careers before, or instead of, settling down. The high cost of housing and lavish weddings further discourages younger people from committing, while shifting attitudes have stripped staying single of its former stigma. Greater urban mobility, finally, scatters people across cities far from their established social networks, making lasting partnerships harder to form and easier to dissolve.
Whether this genuinely requires a solution depends on which consequences one chooses to target. Living alone is a perfectly legitimate lifestyle, yet widespread isolation carries real costs, ranging from chronic loneliness to inefficiently underused housing stock. Governments could respond by making family formation less financially daunting, for instance through affordable housing schemes and parental leave that does not penalise careers. Communities, meanwhile, can combat isolation by designing shared spaces and social programmes that connect solitary residents with one another. Crucially, however, such efforts should support people's choices rather than coerce them back into traditional arrangements.
In conclusion, the retreat from marriage reflects greater personal freedom and mounting economic pressure in roughly equal measure. The appropriate response is not to push citizens back towards the altar, but to tackle the loneliness and economic barriers that often accompany solitary living, so that those who do wish to form families are able to do so without undue hardship.
Examiner’s notes
- Task Response: the essay separates causes (social and economic) from solutions, and thoughtfully addresses the 'if any' qualifier by questioning whether intervention is even warranted, fully covering the prompt.
- Coherence & Cohesion: ideas are sequenced with subtle markers such as 'finally' embedded mid-sentence and 'Crucially', and pronoun reference ('such efforts') keeps the argument tightly knit.
- Lexical Resource: collocations like 'single-person households', 'family formation' and 'underused housing stock' show precise, topic-appropriate vocabulary deployed flexibly.